<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Firefox, Debian Sarge and Gmail, again</title>
	<atom:link href="http://rym.waglo.com/wordpress/2006/10/06/firefox-debian-sarge-and-gmail-again/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://rym.waglo.com/wordpress/2006/10/06/firefox-debian-sarge-and-gmail-again/</link>
	<description>Robin Millette / Waglo Labs / Penser Libre</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 02 Dec 2008 23:40:18 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.5</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Sébastien Boisvert</title>
		<link>http://rym.waglo.com/wordpress/2006/10/06/firefox-debian-sarge-and-gmail-again/#comment-46867</link>
		<dc:creator>Sébastien Boisvert</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Oct 2006 04:14:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rym.waglo.com/wordpress/2006/10/06/firefox-debian-sarge-and-gmail-again/#comment-46867</guid>
		<description>Maxime Dupuis:

According to what M. Robin Milette wrote, I believe that he is not using FireFox 2 beta 1 because he just want to have a single  codebase. Me I use Ubuntu GNU/Linux and I don't like to install any programs that are not officially supported by the community. Maybe it's like in ruby on rails, KISS (Keep It Simple, Stupid!).

Sébastien Boisvert</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Maxime Dupuis:</p>
<p>According to what M. Robin Milette wrote, I believe that he is not using FireFox 2 beta 1 because he just want to have a single  codebase. Me I use Ubuntu GNU/Linux and I don&#8217;t like to install any programs that are not officially supported by the community. Maybe it&#8217;s like in ruby on rails, KISS (Keep It Simple, Stupid!).</p>
<p>Sébastien Boisvert</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robin</title>
		<link>http://rym.waglo.com/wordpress/2006/10/06/firefox-debian-sarge-and-gmail-again/#comment-45676</link>
		<dc:creator>Robin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Oct 2006 17:12:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rym.waglo.com/wordpress/2006/10/06/firefox-debian-sarge-and-gmail-again/#comment-45676</guid>
		<description>max, because it's "good enough"? I never had a problem with it I couldn't fix in a couple hours. I really really appreciate that in Debian. Once  you've setup a program and it works, you can forget about it for two years or so. Less worries, more berries ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>max, because it&#8217;s &#8220;good enough&#8221;? I never had a problem with it I couldn&#8217;t fix in a couple hours. I really really appreciate that in Debian. Once  you&#8217;ve setup a program and it works, you can forget about it for two years or so. Less worries, more berries ;)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mdupuis</title>
		<link>http://rym.waglo.com/wordpress/2006/10/06/firefox-debian-sarge-and-gmail-again/#comment-45675</link>
		<dc:creator>mdupuis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Oct 2006 17:07:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rym.waglo.com/wordpress/2006/10/06/firefox-debian-sarge-and-gmail-again/#comment-45675</guid>
		<description>Why stick with 1.0.4 when there's that beta 1 of Firefox 2 out there? I'm running it and I must say, it's a lot more stable than 1.5.0.7 (in my case). Just grab the archive and use it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why stick with 1.0.4 when there&#8217;s that beta 1 of Firefox 2 out there? I&#8217;m running it and I must say, it&#8217;s a lot more stable than 1.5.0.7 (in my case). Just grab the archive and use it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robin</title>
		<link>http://rym.waglo.com/wordpress/2006/10/06/firefox-debian-sarge-and-gmail-again/#comment-45658</link>
		<dc:creator>Robin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Oct 2006 09:36:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rym.waglo.com/wordpress/2006/10/06/firefox-debian-sarge-and-gmail-again/#comment-45658</guid>
		<description>Bosko, I tried the first Google Reader when it launched - I wasn't impressed but then learned that it was developped on top of a rich API and the Reader seemed like a quick demo. I was using News Alloy for a while, but like every other aggregator, I stopped using it after a month or so. I still check its blog and it mentionned a new Google Reader which I haven't bothered to check out yet.

You might be interested in &lt;a href='http://newsalloy.com/' rel="nofollow"&gt;News Alloy&lt;/a&gt;, it's got all sorts of features, including mobile support.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bosko, I tried the first Google Reader when it launched - I wasn&#8217;t impressed but then learned that it was developped on top of a rich API and the Reader seemed like a quick demo. I was using News Alloy for a while, but like every other aggregator, I stopped using it after a month or so. I still check its blog and it mentionned a new Google Reader which I haven&#8217;t bothered to check out yet.</p>
<p>You might be interested in <a href='http://newsalloy.com/' rel="nofollow">News Alloy</a>, it&#8217;s got all sorts of features, including mobile support.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robin</title>
		<link>http://rym.waglo.com/wordpress/2006/10/06/firefox-debian-sarge-and-gmail-again/#comment-45657</link>
		<dc:creator>Robin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Oct 2006 09:31:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rym.waglo.com/wordpress/2006/10/06/firefox-debian-sarge-and-gmail-again/#comment-45657</guid>
		<description>&lt;a href='http://groups.google.com/group/Gmail-Problem-solving/browse_thread/thread/f5ce82361bc60a3d/819cd9070e57db32#819cd9070e57db32' rel="nofollow" rel="nofollow"&gt;Found this excellent tip by wár17 §&lt;/a&gt; to use an alternate address, &lt;a href='https://mail.google.com/mail/s/' rel="nofollow" rel="nofollow"&gt;https://mail.google.com/mail/s/&lt;/a&gt;. Works great! Also, the "/s/" might not be needed, just &lt;em&gt;http&lt;strong&gt;s&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/em&gt; instead of &lt;em&gt;http&lt;/em&gt; seems to fix it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href='http://groups.google.com/group/Gmail-Problem-solving/browse_thread/thread/f5ce82361bc60a3d/819cd9070e57db32#819cd9070e57db32' rel="nofollow" rel="nofollow">Found this excellent tip by wár17 §</a> to use an alternate address, <a href='https://mail.google.com/mail/s/' rel="nofollow" rel="nofollow">https://mail.google.com/mail/s/</a>. Works great! Also, the &#8220;/s/&#8221; might not be needed, just <em>http<strong>s</strong></em> instead of <em>http</em> seems to fix it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bosko</title>
		<link>http://rym.waglo.com/wordpress/2006/10/06/firefox-debian-sarge-and-gmail-again/#comment-45650</link>
		<dc:creator>Bosko</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Oct 2006 04:48:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rym.waglo.com/wordpress/2006/10/06/firefox-debian-sarge-and-gmail-again/#comment-45650</guid>
		<description>I've only noticed gmail has gotten slower lately; though I'm running 1.5.0.7 (latest). I haven't attempted to quantify the slowdown, but it certainly feels a lot less responsive.

On the other hand, I've been told that the new Google Reader is quite impressive.  One of these days I suppose I'll try it out (I like the idea of being able to view my feeds from my smartphone, but dislike that i'll probably have to sacrifice the ability to read feeds offline if I make the switch).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve only noticed gmail has gotten slower lately; though I&#8217;m running 1.5.0.7 (latest). I haven&#8217;t attempted to quantify the slowdown, but it certainly feels a lot less responsive.</p>
<p>On the other hand, I&#8217;ve been told that the new Google Reader is quite impressive.  One of these days I suppose I&#8217;ll try it out (I like the idea of being able to view my feeds from my smartphone, but dislike that i&#8217;ll probably have to sacrifice the ability to read feeds offline if I make the switch).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
